skip to Main Content

Iowa Bill to Allow Parents to Sue Advances of ‘Obscene’ School Books | Government and politics

ERIN MURPHY Gazette Des Moines Office

DES MOINES — Concerns about what some see as obscene material in school libraries and school curricula clashed with concerns about censorship and for educators who feel under attack from some policymakers during a legislative hearing Thursday at the Iowa Capitol.

The hearing focused on Senate File 2198, which would allow parents to take legal action against schools or educators who distribute books or materials that parents deem obscene.

The bill was introduced by Sen. Jake Chapman, of Adel, and supported at Thursday’s hearing by the senses. Brad Zaun from Urbandale and Jason Schultz from Schleswig. All are Republicans.

Chapman said the legislation is necessary because parents have no other recourse when school districts refuse to remove books or other materials that parents consider obscene.

“Parents are totally excluded from this equation. They have no other recourse. That’s why this bill is needed,” Chapman said.

People also read…

  • UPDATE: A man on meth stole a car from a river with an elderly Davenport man inside, killing him, authorities say
  • LeClaire fatal boating accident trial: Thiel case moves to closing arguments, then jury
  • Thiel takes witness stand in fatal LeClaire boat crash trial: Another boat ‘sort of lost control’
  • Advisor, mentor, coach, educator, cop: Pleasant Valley High School resource manager honored for role in saving students’ lives
  • Two Davenport men face federal child pornography charges
  • Former Valley Bank executive fined $500 for role in scheme to defraud SBA
  • LeClaire double-death boating accident trial: State rests, defense begins
  • Bally’s Quad Cities Casino & Hotel Announces 2022 Entertainment Lineup
  • Scott County jury convicts Davenport probationer who beat woman with tire iron
  • Black box reveals Thiel’s boat was traveling nearly 57mph before LeClaire’s fatal crash
  • Athletics Preparation: Drake Relays Forms Chart
  • Coss: Dunsworth will be remembered more as ‘a genuine man’ than titles
  • Moline Police Encourage Quad-Cities to Party Responsibly on ‘Snoop DO-Double G Day’
  • Announcement of battery-powered aircraft facility surprises Rock Island town officials
  • More trails, new skating rink? What the future may hold for Davenport Parks and Recreation

Most districts have a process for parents to raise concerns about materials in libraries or classrooms. Some parents who testified said they raised concerns about certain books, but their district decided not to remove them. Some of the books contain isolated passages that describe or draw pictures that show sexual acts, including incest. Typically, books have larger themes that have little or nothing to do with the passages.

Iowa law states that to meet the definition of “obscene material”, the material, taken as a whole, must lack “serious literary, scientific, political, or artistic value”.

Complaints have generally centered on books featuring LGBTQ characters or written by LGBTQ authors, or involving non-white characters or authors. Chapman and some of the people who supported the bill on Thursday showed pictures and read passages from books they find offensive.

“It’s pornography in our schools. It’s sexually explicit material,” Chapman said.

Speakers who opposed the bill pointed to the process already in place in schools and said teachers, administrators and librarians should be trusted to do their jobs.

“It’s unfortunate that in some cases people feel like the process hasn’t worked properly, and that’s something we can do better by educating our local elected officials on how to do it,” he said. said Emily Piper, lobbyist for the Iowa Association of School Boards. “Our school boards do not knowingly or willfully attempt to inflict pornographic material on our students. We try to do the job to provide quality education.

Melissa Petersen, lobbyist for the Iowa State Education Association, the state’s largest public teachers’ union, said teachers feel under attack from Republican lawmakers who, in addition to this bill, have proposed require all classrooms to be equipped with cameras to broadcast teaching live so parents can watch their student’s teacher at work. This bill was withdrawn from the legislative process earlier this week.

“What I find terribly difficult about this conversation is the presumption … that there are public education professionals who seek to harm students,” Petersen said. “We seem to be doing everything we can to threaten our public education professionals.”

Chapman and Zaun said they think the majority of teachers in Iowa are good. Chapman denounced the media coverage of his speech on the opening day of Parliament, where he said, “Some teachers disguise sexually obscene material as a desired subject and profess that it has artistic and literary value.”

“I can assure you that 99 percent of teachers in the state of Iowa are great teachers,” Zaun said, noting that his wife is a former public school teacher in Des Moines. “It’s not about the teachers. These are the parents. »

With Zaun and Schultz’s approval, the bill can be considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Zaun. But its long-term prospects are uncertain.

Jack Whitver, the Republican Senate Majority Leader for Ankeny, has previously said he doesn’t think increasing criminal penalties for educators is the way to address parents’ concerns. Pat Grassley, the Republican House Speaker of New Hartford, said something similar last Friday.

Grassley said House Republicans are focused on transparency.

“We want to make sure there is transparency in our children’s education and make sure parents are involved,” he said. “But I don’t think the criminal penalty exhibit is something the House is going to do…it’s not going to be part of our conversation.”

Back To Top